Experts ponder reasons for Germanwings French Alps crash that killed 150

Students put candles on a table tennis table in front of the Joseph-Koenig Gymnasium in Haltern, western Germany Tuesday, March 24, 2015. A Germanwings plane from Barcelona crashed on its way to Duesseldorf over the French alps today, 16 school children and 2 teachers from Haltern are among the victims. Image by (AP Photo/Martin Meissner)

The Germanwings plane that crashed in France did so during what should have been the safest part of the flight.

Yet, something went horribly wrong, leading to the death of 150 passengers and crew.

The first clue about what could have happened will be the wreckage itself. If the debris field is compact, then the plane most likely hit the mountains intact. If it is scattered, the plane probably broke up in mid-air.

Todd Curtis, a former Boeing safety engineer who is now director of the Airsafe.com Foundation, said: “If you see a wing here and three miles later you see a fuselage, one doesn’t have to be an expert to speculate that it didn’t happen on the ground; that something happened before it impacted.”

Rescue workers and gendarme gather in Seyne-les-Alpes, French Alps, Tuesday, March 24, 2015, as search-and-rescue teams struggle to reach the remote crash site of Germanwings passenger plane. Image by (AP Photo/Claude Paris)

Germanwings Flight 9525 from Barcelona, Spain, to Duesseldorf, Germany, was flown on an Airbus A320, a workhorse of modern aviation, similar to the Boeing 737.

There are more than 3,600 of them in operation worldwide, according to Airbus, which also makes nearly identical versions of the plane: the smaller A318 and A319 and the stretched A321. An additional 2,500 of those jets are flying.

The A320 family has a good safety record, with just 0.14 fatal accidents per million take-offs, according to a Boeing safety analysis. This particular jet was delivered to Lufthansa – the parent company of Germanwings – in 1991 and had about 58,300 flight hours over 46,700 flights.

People arrive at Barcelona airport in Spain, Tuesday, March 24, 2015. A Germanwings passenger jet carrying 150 people crashed in the French Alps region Tuesday as it traveled from Barcelona to Duesseldorf in Germany. Image by (AP Photo/Manu Fernandez)

Although the investigation is at an early stage, here are some possible causes of the crash:

:: Rapid decompression

The jet averaged more than 5.3 flights a day over its 24 years. That is not unusual for a plane making short trips around Europe, but is on the higher end of what is normal.

Each take-off and landing cycle and the pressurisation and depressurisation associated with it adds stress to the skin of the plane.

Aircraft that fly short, frequent routes go through more of these cycles than planes flying long distances. In 1988, a 19-year-old Aloha Airlines Boeing 737-200 that had made frequent, short hops among the Hawaiian islands lost a large part of its roof. Corrosion and metal fatigue were to blame.

Flight 9525 reportedly descended at 3,000ft per minute from its cruising altitude of 38,000ft – twice the normal speed of a descent.

If there was some type of rapid decompression – whether from metal fatigue or a bomb – the pilots’ first move would be to get the plane down below 10,000 feet, where the air is breathable.

The masks that come down from the overhead bins provide about 10 minutes’ worth of oxygen. So, a descent rate of 3,000ft per minute would get the plane down to breathable air just in time.

Mr Curtis said that initial rate of decent is consistent with what you would see in a decompression situation.

A helicopter takes off from Seyne-les-Alpes, French Alps, Tuesday, March 24, 2015, as search-and-rescue teams struggle to reach the remote, snow-covered crash site of Germanwings passenger plane. Image by (AP Photo/Claude Paris) 

:: Technical error

Airbus jets have one of the most sophisticated cockpits.

However, there have been issues in the past with some of the instruments there. The 2009 crash of Air France Flight 447 started because pilots received false air speed indications as it flew through a storm. Ultimately, pilot error led the plane into a stall, but only after they had received bad data.

More recently, a Lufthansa A321 – the slightly larger version of the A320 – dropped about 4,000ft in one minute after the autopilot unexpectedly lowered the jet’s nose.

Following the November 2014 incident, the European Aviation Safety Agency issued a safety directive warning pilots about the possibility of an error with the angle of attack sensors on the plane.

Pulling up on the jet’s sidestick – a device similar to a yoke – would not pull the jet out of the dive.

The safety agency noted the only way to stop it was to turn off two of the three air data reference units in the cockpit. These units process the flight speed, up or down angle of the nose, and the altitude.

:: Terrorism

There is no indication that this crash is tied to any criminal act, but such actions cannot be ruled out yet.

:: Pilot error

The pilots might have accidentally put the plane into a dive or stall, and not been able to recover from it.

Separately, the pilots could have been so focused on getting the plane below 10,000ft to a breathable atmosphere following decompression that they did not realise how close they were to the mountains until it was too late.

See also: No survivors of Germanwings horror crash in French Alps with 150 onboard

(Press Association)